About us   Editorial Board   Advisory Board   Subscribe   Contact us  
 


CAUCASUS UPDATE

In this section, we publish the weekly analysis of the major events taking place in the Caucasus and beyond. The Caucasus Update is written by our Senior Editor Alexander Jackson. Click here to subscribe.

The North Caucasus in 2009: A Bleak Forecast, CU Issue 19, January 26, 2009

Any analysis of the North Caucasus inevitably becomes a grim list of bombings, murders, and shootings. A discussion of 2009 so far is no exception. On January 18, two ex-police officers were gunned down in Ingushetia and a military officer was killed in Dagestan. Four days earlier, a member of parliament in Karachai-Circassia republic was murdered. On January 13, an explosion blew up the regional bailiff’s offices in Ingushetia, with terrorism suspected as a cause. Perhaps even more disturbingly, January saw the murder of two vocal opponents of the Chechen authorities. On January 19 Stanislav Markelov, a noted human-rights lawyer whose clients included several victims of government human-rights abuses, was gunned down in Moscow.  One of those clients was shot dead just four days previously, in Budapest. Umar Israilov had been outspoken in his criticism of Chechen President Ramzan Kadyrov, claiming that Kadyrov had personally tortured him after arresting him as an insurgent.

Against this dark backdrop Russian President Dimitri Medvedev visited Ingushetia on January 20 for a brief – 90 minutes, to be exact – visit. The trip was apparently intended to do two things – check up on the progress of the recently appointed Ingushetian President Yunus-Bek Yevkurov, and to promise the republic’s leader the firm support of the federal centre – support worth $877.8 million.           The money is intended to improve Ingushetia’s dire economic and social problems, reducing the 57% unemployment rate and thus drawing the sting from the republic’s insurgency. It will also probably be used to improve the inefficient local security forces.

The money will be delivered over the next years, but as a single sum the money is equivalent to three years of Ingushetia’s state budget. Whether or not all of it goes to its intended source is another matter. In a region notorious for corruption, the opportunities for embezzling such a huge inflow of capital are clear. Not that President Yevkurov himself is likely to divert money into his own pocket. A decorated war hero and a notoriously tough character, shortly after his appointment in October 2008 he spoke out against corruption in the local elite and ‘cowardice’ in the police force. But stamping out corruption, and delivering economic progress, will be an uphill struggle. Even if President Yevkurov succeeds, this alone will not solve Ingushetia’s problems whilst the broader troubles of the region remain.

Quelling the Islamist insurgency in one republic does not solve the problem, but simply shifts it. As violence in Chechnya decreased after 2005, so it rose in Ingushetia (and to a lesser extent Dagestan), which indicates the regional nature of the movement, expressed most clearly in calls for a united ‘Caucasus Emirate’ and in inter-republic co-operation during ambushes and raids. Furthermore, the inter-linked nature of the region’s economy means that building a prosperous economic climate in one republic is of limited use without addressing the corruption and structural economic problems in neighbouring republics.

In other words, the financial bounty being lavished on Ingushetia, and President Yevkurov’s zeal for good governance, will be of limited use without a much wider, more intensive program of investment and reform, as well as a concerted effort to deal with the insurgency throughout the North Caucasus and a commitment to human rights that neither Moscow nor the republics themselves demonstrate. Nor can it solve the territorial disputes between Ingushetia and its neighbours, Chechnya and North Ossetia. In the case of the former, the two republics are at odds over the delimitation of their formal border. In the case of the latter, both regions are still dealing with the brief Ingush-Ossetian conflict of 1992, in which ethnic Ingush were forced from their homes in the Prigorodny district in North Ossetia, leading to the deaths of 600 civilians: thousands are still displaced within Ingushetia itself. A recent rise in insurgent attacks in North Ossetia has been blamed on Ingush forces determined to reclaim the Prigorodny district. President Yevkurov will have to find a solution which is acceptable to his Ingush constituents without risking a new confrontation, especially since administrative borders within each republic have to be finally drawn up by the end of 2009 – if Yevkurov divides up his republic without making any claims on Prigorodny, he will provoke the murky nexus between Ingush nationalists and Islamist insurgents. The federal centre will probably have to hold the ring between competing political forces, a job it has not done particularly well in the past.

Some commentators have stressed, in the context of the August war between Russia and Georgia, that a deterioration of security in the North Caucasus could spill over into the South Caucasus, or vice versa, and that the war has precipitated a major decline in the security of the North Caucasus. Beyond the obvious fact that Moscow’s recognition of ‘independence’ for Abkhazia and South Ossetia has emboldened the arguments of separatists in the North Caucasus, this is disputable. Indeed, what is striking is how littlethe geopolitical earthquake in Georgia affected the dynamics of the North Caucasian insurgency. The region has continued its gradual collapse into violence, regardless of events south of the Caucasus mountains. It is, furthermore, unlikely that the situation in Ingushetia or Dagestan will ever reach a point comparable to the Chechen wars of the 1990s. The federal government is, financial and social problems notwithstanding, far stronger than it was then. The money promised to Ingushetia will not solve its urgent problems, but it will function as a sticking plaster to patch them up and keep the republic stumbling along.

But whilst the North Caucasus may not dissolve into anarchy, the future is nonetheless bleak. The slide into violence will be accompanied by a descent into authoritarianism and further abuse of human rights by the security forces. A ‘tough approach’ by President Yevkurov is unlikely to change this pattern, even if it addresses corruption and greed amongst local officials. As the country’s economic situation worsens, the federal subsidies which prop up the North Caucasian republics will become less and less effective, whilst xenophobia against Caucasian immigrants in the rest of Russia will cause remittances to drop and lead to further unemployment as migrant workers return home. For all President Yevkurov’s good intentions, the North Caucasus is in for another bad year.



"The North Caucasus in 2009: A Bleak Forecast, CU Issue 19, January 26, 2009" | 1 comment | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

by Sami Pratt on Sat Mar 14, 2009 8:03 am
This is amazing. Great incisive comments


PREVIOUS ISSUES

  Caspian Compromise Backfires for Russia and Iran, CU Issue 83, November 24, 2010
  Turkey in a Tight Spot on Missile Defense, CU Issue 82, November 11, 2010
  The OSCE and Kyrgyzstan’s Election, CU Issue 81, October 30, 2010
  Unblocking the US-Azerbaijan Relationship, CU Issue 80, October 07, 2010
  Nabucco Pipeline: Quo Vadis?, CU Issue 79, September 30, 2010
  Russia tightens its grip in the South Caucasus, CU Issue 78, August 23, 2010
  Armenian Politics: Rigidity Versus Flexibility, CU Issue 77, August 10, 2010
  Russia and Georgia: Ready To Talk?, CU Issue 76, July 21, 2010
  Can the US walk and chew gum at the same time?, CU Issue 75, July 9, 2010
  The Kyrgyzstan Crisis – A Qualified Success for Turkish Diplomacy?, CU Issue 74, June 24, 2010
  Brussels downgrades the Caucasus, CU Issue 73, June 07, 2010
  NATO’s New Strategic Concept and the Caspian Region, CU Issue 72, June 01, 2010
  Joe Biden and European Security, CU Issue 71, May 13, 2010
  Behind the US-Azerbaijan row, CU Issue 70, May 6, 2010
  Turkey and Iran: The risks of failure, CU Issue 69, April 30, 2010
  Kazakhstan, the OSCE, and the crisis in Kyrgyzstan, CU Issue 68, April 19, 2010
  The Implications of the Moscow Bombings, CU Issue 67, April 12, 2010
  Iran Manoeuvres for a role in Karabakh, CU Issue 66, April 5, 2010
  The EU and Abkhazia: Between a rock and a hard place, CU Issue 65, March 16, 2010
  Fallout from the US ‘Genocide’ vote, CU Issue 64, March 9, 2010
  Ukraine's elections and future of GUAM, CU Issue 63, February 10, 2010
  Less Democracy, More Security: Kazakhstan and the OSCE, CU Issue 62, January 18, 2010
  Tackling the North Caucasus Insurgency: Development or Rhetoric?, CU Issue 61, January 11, 2010
  The Caspian Region in 2010, CU Issue 60, January 4, 2010
  The Caspian Region in 2010, CU Issue 59, December 31, 2009
  The Turkmenistan-China Pipeline Changes the Energy Balance, CU Issue 58, December 21, 2009
  Russia’s European Security Treaty, CU Issue 57, December 7, 2009
  The ‘Kidnapping War’ in Georgia and its Implications, CU Issue 56, December 3, 2009
  Azerbaijan Shifts its Energy Priorities, CU Issue 55, November 23, 2009
  The South Caucasian States and Afghanistan, CU Issue 54, November 11, 2009
  Is Turkey turning East?, CU Issue 53, November 2, 2009
  What is Russia’s Gameplan for Iran?, CU Issue 52, October 26, 2009
  Turkey, Armenia and Azerbaijan: Where Next?, CU Issue 51, October 19, 2009
  The Armenians of Georgia: A New Flashpoint in the Caucasus?, CU Issue 50, October 12, 2009
  Turkey’s EU Membership: Will The ‘Armenian Opening’ Help?, CU Issue 49, October 5, 2009
  The Missile Defence Shift: Implications for the Caucasus, CU Issue 48, September 22, 2009
  Rising Tensions in the Black Sea , CU Issue 47, September 14, 2009
  Armenia, Turkey, and Azerbaijan: The Clock Is Ticking, CU Issue 46, September 7, 2009
  The Battle of the Bases in Central Asia, CU Issue 45, August 31, 2009
  Russia, Israel, and the S-300s, CU Issue 44, August 24, 2009
  The motivations behind Turkey's 'Kurdish Initiative', CU Issue 43, August 17, 2009
  The Implications of the Turkmenistan-Azerbaijan Dispute, CU Issue 42, August 10, 2009
  What has changed since the August war?, CU Issue 41, August 3, 2009
  The Internal Dynamics of Armenia’s Karabakh Policy, CU Issue 40, July 20, 2009
  Gazprom’s Baku Triumph, CU Issue 39, July 06, 2009
  Ingushetia: The New Chechnya?, CU Issue 38, June 29, 2009
  Georgias Economy - A Matter for Diplomats, CU Issue 37, June 22, 2009
  ‘Progress’ In The Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Process, CU Issue 36, June 08, 2009
  Iran's Azerbaijanis and the presidential election, CU Issue 35, June 01, 2009
  Nabucco and South Stream - The Race Heats Up, CU Issue 34, May 25, 2009
  China and Central Asia, CU Issue 33, May 19, 2009
  Russia, Georgia, and NATO - A Bad Week, CU Issue 32, May 11, 2009
  The Obama Administration’s Emerging Caucasus Policy, CU Issue 31, April 27, 2009
  Integration and Division in the Caspian Sea, CU Issue 30, April 20, 2009
  The Turkish-Armenian Rapprochement - Implications for the South Caucasus, CU Issue 29, April 13, 2009
  Turkey's local elections and Armenian issue, CU Issue 28, April 6, 2009
  Is There Life Left In The Nabucco Project?, CU Issue 27, March 30, 2009
  Problems and Prospects for Russian Military Reform, CU Issue 26, March 23, 2009
  Russia and Georgia: Not back to war, CU Issue 25, March 16, 2009
  Armenia: Heading towards crisis?, CU Issue 24, March 9, 2009
  Drug trafficking in the Caucasus, CU Issue 23, February 23, 2009
  Russian-led military block: A real counterweight to NATO?, CU Issue 22, February 16, 2009
  Are the International Missions in Georgia still relevant?, CU Issue 21, February 9, 2009
  Israel and Azerbaijan: Baku’s Balancing Act, CU Issue 20, February 2, 2009
  The North Caucasus in 2009: A Bleak Forecast, CU Issue 19, January 26, 2009
  The Military Balance in Nagorno-Karabakh, CU Issue 18, January 19, 2009
  Russia, Iran, and Barack Obama in 2009, Part II, CU Issue 17, January 12, 2009
  Looking forward to 2009 in the Caucasus and beyond, Part I, CU Issue 16, January 5, 2009
  The opportunities and the risks of NATO’s new supply routes, CU Issue 15, December 22, 2008
  The Black Sea Ambitions of Armenia, CU Issue 14, December 15, 2008
  Another Small Step for Nabucco, CU Issue 13, December 8, 2008
  Will Saakashvili survive politically?, CU Issue 12, December 1, 2008
  The latest fashion: conflict mediation, CU Issue 11, November 24, 2008
  The Baku Energy Summit, CU Issue 10, November 17, 2008
  Obama and the Caucasus, CU Issue 9, November 10, 2008
  Kazakhstan's oil options, CU Issue 8, November 3, 2008
  Is the Minsk Group being sidelined?, CU Issue 7, October 27, 2008
  Gas and oil developments in the Caspian region, CU Issue 6, October 20, 2008
  Where next for the Georgian peace process?, CU Issue 5, October 8, 2008
  Unrest in the North Caucasus, CU Issue 4, September 29, 2008
  Saakashvili's future, CU Issue 3, September 22, 2008
  Iran after the Georgian War, CU Issue 2, September 15, 2008
  Football diplomacy, CU Issue 1, September 8, 2008
       
 
  © 2006-2010 CRIA
  All rights reserved

Editorial Board
Advisory Board
Our Authors

Back Issues
Caucasus Update
Current Issue

Contact Us
Subscribe
Join us on Facebook