About us   Editorial Board   Advisory Board   Subscribe   Contact us  
 


CAUCASUS UPDATE

In this section, we publish the weekly analysis of the major events taking place in the Caucasus and beyond. The Caucasus Update is written by our Senior Editor Alexander Jackson. Click here to subscribe.

Saakashvili's future, CU Issue 3, September 22, 2008

On September 15, EU representatives in Brussels approved a three-year package of financial assistance which will send $700 million dollars to Tbilisi to repair the country after the August war with Russia. NATO representatives were also in Georgia to express their support of the country and to inaugurate the new NATO-Georgia Commission, a new forum for dialogue between the two.

Is this enough to save President Mikheil Saakashvili? The President’s position still looks stable, a month and a half after the war, but his future is certainly not guaranteed. Whatever the truth behind the spark which began the conflict, the attack on South Ossetia and the massive Russian response were President Saakashvili’s personal responsibility, and questions will increasingly be asked within Georgia about his decision. There are a number of factors which will decide his future.

The investigation into the causes of the war - specifically, whether or not Russian armour had entered Georgia before the Georgian attack on South Ossetia, and whether Moscow encouraged South Ossetian units to provoke Georgia - will have an impact on Saakashvili’s standing, but will probably not be decisive either way, unless evidence of his recklessness becomes clear against the backdrop of wider discontent.

The role of the opposition, and of Saakashvili’s own National Movement party will be critical. Fringe parties have begun calling for his resignation, and rumours of discontent within the Defence Ministry have been circulating for some time. However, widespread political opposition to the President has yet to manifest itself. If and when it does, the stance of the ex-speaker of the parliament Nino Burjanadze will be significant. A potential challenger to Saakashvili and a moderate who could deal with Moscow, she could be a catalyst for the opposition.

President Saakashvili’s handling of US and European aid could be a way for him to defuse the emerging dissatisfaction with his rule. If the money is channelled into infrastructure, the armed forces and most importantly the resettlement of internally displaced persons (IDPs) quickly, transparently and effectively then widespread discontent may be averted. If there is no real improvement, especially in war-scarred towns like Gori, Georgia’s economic climate will grow even worse; foreign investment will plummet and unemployment will rise. The implications for Saakashvili are clear.

The issue of IDPs is not a new one in Georgia, given the prior presence of several thousand from Abkhazia and South Ossetia who were forced out in the 1990s.The new situation is significantly different. For one thing, there are many more IDPs from South Ossetia than before. For another, there is now almost no chance that any of these refugees will ever be able to return to their homes, since the provinces are essentially lost to Georgia. They are no longer a political instrument in the peace negotiations and must be resettled for the long term. If not, they are liable to become a weight around President Saakashvili’s neck.

Evidently, continued international aid will be necessary for a comprehensive solution to Georgia’s economic problems. Whether or not it is forthcoming will depend on the political willingness of Western leaders to continue supporting Saakashvili, a man described by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev as a “political corpse”. So far, they have stood by him, despite a good deal of irritation in Brussels and Washington about his behaviour. There are two key events before the end of the year that will determine the future of Western political backing - the US presidential election and the NATO summit in December.

Although there is no significant divergence in Russian policy between either of the two presidential candidates, Senator John McCain has been a stalwart supporter of Georgia, and President Saakashvili, for some time. He is also a sharp critic of Moscow, and suggested this week that the world recognise Russia’s separatist-minded republic of Chechnya as a response to its recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Senator Barack Obama has less experience of the region (although his vice-presidential candiate Joe Biden is more familiar), and may be less keen to make any dramatic displays of support than his rival. In any case, the Bush Administration will be unwilling to do anything too significant in its last few months of office, and would be unlikely to make too much noise in the event of a political campaign against Saakashvili over the winter.

The NATO summit will be far more critical. If the Alliance reiterates its support for Georgia’s membership, President Saakashvili will find a new wind in his sails at home; his gamble will have paid off, in a sense. If the council of NATO ministers puts Georgian membership out of reach, however, the fallout will be disastrous for him. He will have been seen to lose not only Abkhazia and South Ossetia, but also Tbilisi’s chances of joining an organisation which is still extremely popular in Georgia.

Finally, there is Russia itself. The Kremlin has made no secret of its desire to see Saakashvili out of office. Anti-Russian sentiment within Georgia will more or less quash the possibility that any opposition party would accept covert support from Moscow, but Russia may make it clear that unless President Saakashvili is ejected, they will continue to threaten Georgia militarily, economically, and politically.

How the President would respond to discontent - whether in the form of opposition amongst the political elite or large-scale public protests - is unclear. Last November he cracked down hard on demonstrators on the streets of the capital, but he has also tied his relationship to the West, as well as his mandate, to his reputation as an advocate of constitutional democracy. The EU and NATO may remove their support (for instance, by turning off the aid tap and suspending the NATO-Georgia Commission) if he deploys the security forces or starts hounding out opponents - the NATO Secretary General stressed this week in Tbilisi that Georgia’s future security and its relationship with the West depended on its commitment to democracy. A lack of support from the Euro-Atlantic community would leave Tbilisi at Moscow‘s mercy more than ever and shake the country‘s nascent democracy to its core. In that case, Saakashvili will have to decide what he cares about most - his presidency, or his country.



"Saakashvili's future, CU Issue 3, September 22, 2008" | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
PREVIOUS ISSUES

  Caspian Compromise Backfires for Russia and Iran, CU Issue 83, November 24, 2010
  Turkey in a Tight Spot on Missile Defense, CU Issue 82, November 11, 2010
  The OSCE and Kyrgyzstan’s Election, CU Issue 81, October 30, 2010
  Unblocking the US-Azerbaijan Relationship, CU Issue 80, October 07, 2010
  Nabucco Pipeline: Quo Vadis?, CU Issue 79, September 30, 2010
  Russia tightens its grip in the South Caucasus, CU Issue 78, August 23, 2010
  Armenian Politics: Rigidity Versus Flexibility, CU Issue 77, August 10, 2010
  Russia and Georgia: Ready To Talk?, CU Issue 76, July 21, 2010
  Can the US walk and chew gum at the same time?, CU Issue 75, July 9, 2010
  The Kyrgyzstan Crisis – A Qualified Success for Turkish Diplomacy?, CU Issue 74, June 24, 2010
  Brussels downgrades the Caucasus, CU Issue 73, June 07, 2010
  NATO’s New Strategic Concept and the Caspian Region, CU Issue 72, June 01, 2010
  Joe Biden and European Security, CU Issue 71, May 13, 2010
  Behind the US-Azerbaijan row, CU Issue 70, May 6, 2010
  Turkey and Iran: The risks of failure, CU Issue 69, April 30, 2010
  Kazakhstan, the OSCE, and the crisis in Kyrgyzstan, CU Issue 68, April 19, 2010
  The Implications of the Moscow Bombings, CU Issue 67, April 12, 2010
  Iran Manoeuvres for a role in Karabakh, CU Issue 66, April 5, 2010
  The EU and Abkhazia: Between a rock and a hard place, CU Issue 65, March 16, 2010
  Fallout from the US ‘Genocide’ vote, CU Issue 64, March 9, 2010
  Ukraine's elections and future of GUAM, CU Issue 63, February 10, 2010
  Less Democracy, More Security: Kazakhstan and the OSCE, CU Issue 62, January 18, 2010
  Tackling the North Caucasus Insurgency: Development or Rhetoric?, CU Issue 61, January 11, 2010
  The Caspian Region in 2010, CU Issue 60, January 4, 2010
  The Caspian Region in 2010, CU Issue 59, December 31, 2009
  The Turkmenistan-China Pipeline Changes the Energy Balance, CU Issue 58, December 21, 2009
  Russia’s European Security Treaty, CU Issue 57, December 7, 2009
  The ‘Kidnapping War’ in Georgia and its Implications, CU Issue 56, December 3, 2009
  Azerbaijan Shifts its Energy Priorities, CU Issue 55, November 23, 2009
  The South Caucasian States and Afghanistan, CU Issue 54, November 11, 2009
  Is Turkey turning East?, CU Issue 53, November 2, 2009
  What is Russia’s Gameplan for Iran?, CU Issue 52, October 26, 2009
  Turkey, Armenia and Azerbaijan: Where Next?, CU Issue 51, October 19, 2009
  The Armenians of Georgia: A New Flashpoint in the Caucasus?, CU Issue 50, October 12, 2009
  Turkey’s EU Membership: Will The ‘Armenian Opening’ Help?, CU Issue 49, October 5, 2009
  The Missile Defence Shift: Implications for the Caucasus, CU Issue 48, September 22, 2009
  Rising Tensions in the Black Sea , CU Issue 47, September 14, 2009
  Armenia, Turkey, and Azerbaijan: The Clock Is Ticking, CU Issue 46, September 7, 2009
  The Battle of the Bases in Central Asia, CU Issue 45, August 31, 2009
  Russia, Israel, and the S-300s, CU Issue 44, August 24, 2009
  The motivations behind Turkey's 'Kurdish Initiative', CU Issue 43, August 17, 2009
  The Implications of the Turkmenistan-Azerbaijan Dispute, CU Issue 42, August 10, 2009
  What has changed since the August war?, CU Issue 41, August 3, 2009
  The Internal Dynamics of Armenia’s Karabakh Policy, CU Issue 40, July 20, 2009
  Gazprom’s Baku Triumph, CU Issue 39, July 06, 2009
  Ingushetia: The New Chechnya?, CU Issue 38, June 29, 2009
  Georgias Economy - A Matter for Diplomats, CU Issue 37, June 22, 2009
  ‘Progress’ In The Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Process, CU Issue 36, June 08, 2009
  Iran's Azerbaijanis and the presidential election, CU Issue 35, June 01, 2009
  Nabucco and South Stream - The Race Heats Up, CU Issue 34, May 25, 2009
  China and Central Asia, CU Issue 33, May 19, 2009
  Russia, Georgia, and NATO - A Bad Week, CU Issue 32, May 11, 2009
  The Obama Administration’s Emerging Caucasus Policy, CU Issue 31, April 27, 2009
  Integration and Division in the Caspian Sea, CU Issue 30, April 20, 2009
  The Turkish-Armenian Rapprochement - Implications for the South Caucasus, CU Issue 29, April 13, 2009
  Turkey's local elections and Armenian issue, CU Issue 28, April 6, 2009
  Is There Life Left In The Nabucco Project?, CU Issue 27, March 30, 2009
  Problems and Prospects for Russian Military Reform, CU Issue 26, March 23, 2009
  Russia and Georgia: Not back to war, CU Issue 25, March 16, 2009
  Armenia: Heading towards crisis?, CU Issue 24, March 9, 2009
  Drug trafficking in the Caucasus, CU Issue 23, February 23, 2009
  Russian-led military block: A real counterweight to NATO?, CU Issue 22, February 16, 2009
  Are the International Missions in Georgia still relevant?, CU Issue 21, February 9, 2009
  Israel and Azerbaijan: Baku’s Balancing Act, CU Issue 20, February 2, 2009
  The North Caucasus in 2009: A Bleak Forecast, CU Issue 19, January 26, 2009
  The Military Balance in Nagorno-Karabakh, CU Issue 18, January 19, 2009
  Russia, Iran, and Barack Obama in 2009, Part II, CU Issue 17, January 12, 2009
  Looking forward to 2009 in the Caucasus and beyond, Part I, CU Issue 16, January 5, 2009
  The opportunities and the risks of NATO’s new supply routes, CU Issue 15, December 22, 2008
  The Black Sea Ambitions of Armenia, CU Issue 14, December 15, 2008
  Another Small Step for Nabucco, CU Issue 13, December 8, 2008
  Will Saakashvili survive politically?, CU Issue 12, December 1, 2008
  The latest fashion: conflict mediation, CU Issue 11, November 24, 2008
  The Baku Energy Summit, CU Issue 10, November 17, 2008
  Obama and the Caucasus, CU Issue 9, November 10, 2008
  Kazakhstan's oil options, CU Issue 8, November 3, 2008
  Is the Minsk Group being sidelined?, CU Issue 7, October 27, 2008
  Gas and oil developments in the Caspian region, CU Issue 6, October 20, 2008
  Where next for the Georgian peace process?, CU Issue 5, October 8, 2008
  Unrest in the North Caucasus, CU Issue 4, September 29, 2008
  Saakashvili's future, CU Issue 3, September 22, 2008
  Iran after the Georgian War, CU Issue 2, September 15, 2008
  Football diplomacy, CU Issue 1, September 8, 2008
       
 
  © 2006-2010 CRIA
  All rights reserved

Editorial Board
Advisory Board
Our Authors

Back Issues
Caucasus Update
Current Issue

Contact Us
Subscribe
Join us on Facebook