About us   Editorial Board   Advisory Board   Subscribe   Contact us  
 


CAUCASUS UPDATE

In this section, we publish the weekly analysis of the major events taking place in the Caucasus and beyond. The Caucasus Update is written by our Senior Editor Alexander Jackson. Click here to subscribe.

Georgias Economy - A Matter for Diplomats, CU Issue 37, June 22, 2009

This week the Georgian prime minister, Nika Gilauri, said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal that his country had finally gone officially into recession, with the economy forecasted to shrink by 1.5% this year (WSJ, June 18). He expressed confidence that the government is prepared and ready for the worst of the downturn, but predicting Georgia’s economy is not an easy task.

The country’s economic situation has been closely interlinked with its political fortunes. After the Rose Revolution in 2003, a wave of liberalisation and anti-corruption measures by the new Saakashvili administration sent Georgia’s credit rating soaring. When the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline opened in 2005, cementing Georgia’s reputation as a transit corridor, President Saakashvili was able to claim further success (despite the fact that the BTC was planned during the tenure of his predecessor Eduard Shevardnadze).

Foreign direct investment (FDI) grew from $453 million in 2005 to $1.6 billion in 2007, and GDP growth accelerated to 12.4% in 2007: despite the turbulent relationship with Russia, on the one hand, and continued political turmoil on the other, foreign investors continued to pour money into this pro-Western, liberalising state.

The August 2008 war with Russia changed all that. For investors, the conflict was an instructive lesson in the need to account for political risk. Rather than a strategically-located investment opportunity, Georgia began to be seen as a diplomatically isolated, erratically-run country. Shortly afterwards later, the collapse of Lehman Brothers heralded the start of the global recession. And recent months have seen Georgia succumb to political paralysis as growing opposition to President Saakashvili has culminated in mass street protests.

The consequences of these three shocks were made clear by the Office of Statistics of Georgia this week: FDI plummeted to $124.7 million in the first quarter of 2009, down from $537.6 million in the same period of 2008 (Civil.ge, June 17). The construction industry, one of the mainstays of Georgia’s economic boom, slumped from $171.8 million to $6.2 million. GDP growth, already down to 2.4% due to the traumas of the year’s second half, is expected to be just 1%.

So why has it taken Georgia so long to slip into recession? The combination of a continued external threat, domestic turmoil, and a worldwide economic crash would bring many countries to their knees. Vladimer Papava, former Georgian Economy Minister and now a senior fellow at the Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies, argues that the Georgian economy has actually been boosted by the aftermath of the war, specifically the $4.5 billion of aid pledged by donors in Brussels in October and $750 million promised by the IMF in September (BBC News, October 22). This ‘paradox of war’, Professor Papava told CRIA, “may enable the country to avoid the banking and currency crisis”. Georgia’s ability to withstand these shocks has been aided by its relative isolation from world financial markets, unlike many other former Soviet republics in Eastern Europe.

Delivery of the aid pledged at Brussels may be difficult, for although three-quarters of the money should be delivered by September, foreign governments may drag their feet when it comes to paying out in the middle of a recession. Transparency is another problem – allegations of corruption continue to dog the government and the influx of so much money provides ample opportunity for officials to take a cut.

If aid money is – or appears to be – stolen by members of the ruling elite, the opposition to President Saakashvili will only intensify. So far, however, what has been striking about the protests which have occupied downtown Tbilisi since April 9 is the absence of economic motives. The opposition’s demands have been almost exclusively focused upon President Saakashvili’s alleged authoritarianism and his decision to launch the attack on South Ossetia. Compare this with the protests in Iran, where similar complaints – state repression and an isolationist foreign policy – are accompanied and arguably even overshadowed by economic pessimism.

Professor Papava argues that economic problems have never been a motivation behind unrest in Georgia. Decades of economic stagnation under the USSR and the turmoil of the 1990s have led to a certain stoicism amongst the Georgian people. And it is probably true that for many, the last few years have seen an improvement in their material situation, a development for which the Saakashvili government has taken full credit. Therefore the oppositional strategy of occupying swathes of the capital stands a very good chance of backfiring. By allowing the demonstrations to continue for months, the authorities have quietly helped to portray the protestors as troublemakers who have shut down parts of the local economy and contributed to Georgia’s reputation as an investment black spot (Civil.ge, June 20). An insightful piece by Nana Sajaia for Transitions Online on June 16 reveals the frustration of many Tbilisi businesses towards the demonstrators (TOL, June 16).

The opposition seems to be aware of this, which explains the debate within the opposition over whether or not to block roads and railways, a move which the government warned constituted a ‘red line’ (MSNBC, May 27). Blockading key infrastructure would destroy the protests’ popular support and give the administration justification for a crackdown.

The government is nonetheless being disingenuous by claiming that “street politics” was the sole reason for the economic slump in the first half of the year. This conveniently absolves the government for any responsibility for the protests themselves. It also ignores the Russian artillery in range of Tbilisi: a far more worrying situation for foreign investors and the biggest obstacle to a normal business environment. The aid money pledged at Brussels may help to hide the damage caused by the conflict, but it is not a panacea. Regaining Georgia’s financial vitality will be a matter for diplomats, not economists.



"Georgias Economy - A Matter for Diplomats, CU Issue 37, June 22, 2009" | 1 comment | Search Discussion
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

by Alexander Tvalchrelidze on Mon Jun 29, 2009 5:00 pm
The article is excellent!


PREVIOUS ISSUES

  Caspian Compromise Backfires for Russia and Iran, CU Issue 83, November 24, 2010
  Turkey in a Tight Spot on Missile Defense, CU Issue 82, November 11, 2010
  The OSCE and Kyrgyzstan’s Election, CU Issue 81, October 30, 2010
  Unblocking the US-Azerbaijan Relationship, CU Issue 80, October 07, 2010
  Nabucco Pipeline: Quo Vadis?, CU Issue 79, September 30, 2010
  Russia tightens its grip in the South Caucasus, CU Issue 78, August 23, 2010
  Armenian Politics: Rigidity Versus Flexibility, CU Issue 77, August 10, 2010
  Russia and Georgia: Ready To Talk?, CU Issue 76, July 21, 2010
  Can the US walk and chew gum at the same time?, CU Issue 75, July 9, 2010
  The Kyrgyzstan Crisis – A Qualified Success for Turkish Diplomacy?, CU Issue 74, June 24, 2010
  Brussels downgrades the Caucasus, CU Issue 73, June 07, 2010
  NATO’s New Strategic Concept and the Caspian Region, CU Issue 72, June 01, 2010
  Joe Biden and European Security, CU Issue 71, May 13, 2010
  Behind the US-Azerbaijan row, CU Issue 70, May 6, 2010
  Turkey and Iran: The risks of failure, CU Issue 69, April 30, 2010
  Kazakhstan, the OSCE, and the crisis in Kyrgyzstan, CU Issue 68, April 19, 2010
  The Implications of the Moscow Bombings, CU Issue 67, April 12, 2010
  Iran Manoeuvres for a role in Karabakh, CU Issue 66, April 5, 2010
  The EU and Abkhazia: Between a rock and a hard place, CU Issue 65, March 16, 2010
  Fallout from the US ‘Genocide’ vote, CU Issue 64, March 9, 2010
  Ukraine's elections and future of GUAM, CU Issue 63, February 10, 2010
  Less Democracy, More Security: Kazakhstan and the OSCE, CU Issue 62, January 18, 2010
  Tackling the North Caucasus Insurgency: Development or Rhetoric?, CU Issue 61, January 11, 2010
  The Caspian Region in 2010, CU Issue 60, January 4, 2010
  The Caspian Region in 2010, CU Issue 59, December 31, 2009
  The Turkmenistan-China Pipeline Changes the Energy Balance, CU Issue 58, December 21, 2009
  Russia’s European Security Treaty, CU Issue 57, December 7, 2009
  The ‘Kidnapping War’ in Georgia and its Implications, CU Issue 56, December 3, 2009
  Azerbaijan Shifts its Energy Priorities, CU Issue 55, November 23, 2009
  The South Caucasian States and Afghanistan, CU Issue 54, November 11, 2009
  Is Turkey turning East?, CU Issue 53, November 2, 2009
  What is Russia’s Gameplan for Iran?, CU Issue 52, October 26, 2009
  Turkey, Armenia and Azerbaijan: Where Next?, CU Issue 51, October 19, 2009
  The Armenians of Georgia: A New Flashpoint in the Caucasus?, CU Issue 50, October 12, 2009
  Turkey’s EU Membership: Will The ‘Armenian Opening’ Help?, CU Issue 49, October 5, 2009
  The Missile Defence Shift: Implications for the Caucasus, CU Issue 48, September 22, 2009
  Rising Tensions in the Black Sea , CU Issue 47, September 14, 2009
  Armenia, Turkey, and Azerbaijan: The Clock Is Ticking, CU Issue 46, September 7, 2009
  The Battle of the Bases in Central Asia, CU Issue 45, August 31, 2009
  Russia, Israel, and the S-300s, CU Issue 44, August 24, 2009
  The motivations behind Turkey's 'Kurdish Initiative', CU Issue 43, August 17, 2009
  The Implications of the Turkmenistan-Azerbaijan Dispute, CU Issue 42, August 10, 2009
  What has changed since the August war?, CU Issue 41, August 3, 2009
  The Internal Dynamics of Armenia’s Karabakh Policy, CU Issue 40, July 20, 2009
  Gazprom’s Baku Triumph, CU Issue 39, July 06, 2009
  Ingushetia: The New Chechnya?, CU Issue 38, June 29, 2009
  Georgias Economy - A Matter for Diplomats, CU Issue 37, June 22, 2009
  ‘Progress’ In The Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Process, CU Issue 36, June 08, 2009
  Iran's Azerbaijanis and the presidential election, CU Issue 35, June 01, 2009
  Nabucco and South Stream - The Race Heats Up, CU Issue 34, May 25, 2009
  China and Central Asia, CU Issue 33, May 19, 2009
  Russia, Georgia, and NATO - A Bad Week, CU Issue 32, May 11, 2009
  The Obama Administration’s Emerging Caucasus Policy, CU Issue 31, April 27, 2009
  Integration and Division in the Caspian Sea, CU Issue 30, April 20, 2009
  The Turkish-Armenian Rapprochement - Implications for the South Caucasus, CU Issue 29, April 13, 2009
  Turkey's local elections and Armenian issue, CU Issue 28, April 6, 2009
  Is There Life Left In The Nabucco Project?, CU Issue 27, March 30, 2009
  Problems and Prospects for Russian Military Reform, CU Issue 26, March 23, 2009
  Russia and Georgia: Not back to war, CU Issue 25, March 16, 2009
  Armenia: Heading towards crisis?, CU Issue 24, March 9, 2009
  Drug trafficking in the Caucasus, CU Issue 23, February 23, 2009
  Russian-led military block: A real counterweight to NATO?, CU Issue 22, February 16, 2009
  Are the International Missions in Georgia still relevant?, CU Issue 21, February 9, 2009
  Israel and Azerbaijan: Baku’s Balancing Act, CU Issue 20, February 2, 2009
  The North Caucasus in 2009: A Bleak Forecast, CU Issue 19, January 26, 2009
  The Military Balance in Nagorno-Karabakh, CU Issue 18, January 19, 2009
  Russia, Iran, and Barack Obama in 2009, Part II, CU Issue 17, January 12, 2009
  Looking forward to 2009 in the Caucasus and beyond, Part I, CU Issue 16, January 5, 2009
  The opportunities and the risks of NATO’s new supply routes, CU Issue 15, December 22, 2008
  The Black Sea Ambitions of Armenia, CU Issue 14, December 15, 2008
  Another Small Step for Nabucco, CU Issue 13, December 8, 2008
  Will Saakashvili survive politically?, CU Issue 12, December 1, 2008
  The latest fashion: conflict mediation, CU Issue 11, November 24, 2008
  The Baku Energy Summit, CU Issue 10, November 17, 2008
  Obama and the Caucasus, CU Issue 9, November 10, 2008
  Kazakhstan's oil options, CU Issue 8, November 3, 2008
  Is the Minsk Group being sidelined?, CU Issue 7, October 27, 2008
  Gas and oil developments in the Caspian region, CU Issue 6, October 20, 2008
  Where next for the Georgian peace process?, CU Issue 5, October 8, 2008
  Unrest in the North Caucasus, CU Issue 4, September 29, 2008
  Saakashvili's future, CU Issue 3, September 22, 2008
  Iran after the Georgian War, CU Issue 2, September 15, 2008
  Football diplomacy, CU Issue 1, September 8, 2008
       
 
  © 2006-2010 CRIA
  All rights reserved

Editorial Board
Advisory Board
Our Authors

Back Issues
Caucasus Update
Current Issue

Contact Us
Subscribe
Join us on Facebook