About us   Editorial Board   Advisory Board   Subscribe   Contact us  
 


CAUCASUS UPDATE

In this section, we publish the weekly analysis of the major events taking place in the Caucasus and beyond. The Caucasus Update is written by our Senior Editor Alexander Jackson. Click here to subscribe.

Rising Tensions in the Black Sea , CU Issue 47, September 14, 2009

The shaky ceasefire between Georgia and the Russian-backed separatist regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia has been sorely tested on land in recent months. With the withdrawal of OSCE and UN monitors, the EU Monitoring Mission (EUMM) is the only international body observing the conflict zone – and, unlike the OSCE and UN teams, is unable to enter either region due to Russian vetoes.

But it now looks as if a new theatre of tension has opened up: the sea. On August 24 Georgia’s navy seized a Turkish cargo vessel carrying fuel to Abkhazia. Accusing the ship’s captain of smuggling, a court sentenced him to 24 years in jail, and also locked up the crew (RFE/RL, September 1). Although soon commuted (with the intervention of Turkey’s Foreign Minister), the jail terms indicate just how serious Georgia is about enforcing its naval blockade of Abkhazia (Reuters, September 5).

The response of Abkhazia and its Russian backers was threatening. The de facto Sukhumi government threatened to “destroy” Georgian ships “infringing the sea border of Abkhazia” (BBC, September 2). It also announced that Russia’s Federal Security Service (FSB) would take responsibility for patrolling its coastline, in addition to its role on the Georgian-Abkhaz land border (RIA Novosti, August 28).

These mutual provocations have increased the dangers of a new military confrontation between Russia and Georgia. Similar fears were raised earlier in the year about the situation on land, but conflict was avoided for a number of reasons, which do not apply to the maritime context.

Firstly, the boundaries are greatly different. Despite the torturously plotted and heavily disputed border between Russian and Georgian control, there are at least some clear markers on land. Furthermore, Georgia implicitly accepts the administrative boundaries of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, and begrudgingly tolerates Russian outposts beyond them. This is not the case at sea.

Secondly, the situation on land does not involve blockade-running. Georgia – and indeed the separatist regions – simply does not allow economic traffic to pass through the border zones. On sea, the obstacles to free passage are much scarcer. To put it another way, one does not see Turkish lorries trying to dodge Georgian police units in a bid to reach South Ossetia.

These geographic issues mean that at sea it is easier for outsiders to get through, and harder to establish where they can be stopped without provoking a serious incursion into what Abkhazia sees as its territorial waters. The risks are compounded by the third difference: the military aspect.

Regular exchanges of gunfire have occurred between Georgia and the rebel regions ever since the war. In a few cases, there have been deaths and injuries: in most, just angry accusations. Out in the Black Sea things are different. An exchange of fire between vessels could lead to serious loss of life. If that life was Russian, it would almost certainly constitute a cassus belli, or at least the justification for Moscow to destroy the remains of the Georgian fleet and coast guard. The dangers involved mean that the threshold for naval clashes is much higher: but maritime clashes remain alarmingly possible.

Without a naval capacity, EUMM is blindsided on the Black Sea. It has requested that the maritime tensions be discussed at the next dialogue between Russia, Georgia, and the two separatist regions held regularly in Geneva. But without any input from international observers, the discussion will easily turn into accusation and counter-accusation.

For EU ships to enter the Black Sea, they would need to pass through the Bosporus, in Turkish waters. Under the Montreux Convention of 1936, access to the Black Sea by non-littoral states is tightly restricted – Russia was not slow in reminding Turkey of these limitations when NATO ships attempted to visit Georgia in the aftermath of last year’s war. Although the EU would almost certainly not send warships, any non-commercial ships from non-littoral states are only allowed in the Black Sea for twenty-one days, which would require continuous rotations.

In any case, the capability of ships to effectively monitor the whole of the Abkhaz Black Sea coast would be very difficult. It is not even clear who would be willing to send suitable vessels. And any deployment would be strongly opposed by Abkhazia, according to Marietta Konig, a researcher from the Institute for Peace Research and Security Studies in Hamburg. The separatists and Russia have barred EUMM from accessing the region’s territory on land: why, asks Konig, “should this be any different to the Abkhaz coast?”

The situation’s real impact may be in relations between Georgia and Turkey. Economic links between the territory and Turkey are strong, particularly since the latter is home to a large Abkhazian diaspora. Although apparently intended to help regional stability, the visit of a Turkish deputy foreign minister to Sukhumi was treated with suspicion in Tbilisi, especially since Ünal Çeviköz reportedly sent signals that Turkey could recognize Abkhazia (Hurriyet, September 10). Ankara’s aims in all of this are mysterious – as Konig points out, Turkish economic relationship with Georgia is still strong, and “it is definitely not in Turkish interests to jeopardise this” through cultivating links with Abkhazia.

The rising tensions in the Black Sea add a new dimension to the struggle between Georgia and the separatists. Military clashes may be avoided – the missing ingredient is a lack of political will in Moscow, which would have the final word in any naval encounter with Georgian ships. But these maritime confrontations pose new problems for Georgia, for Turkey, and for the EU. A strategy to calm the situation is urgently needed: but no-one seems to have the ability, or the desire, to prepare one.



"Rising Tensions in the Black Sea , CU Issue 47, September 14, 2009" | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
PREVIOUS ISSUES

  Caspian Compromise Backfires for Russia and Iran, CU Issue 83, November 24, 2010
  Turkey in a Tight Spot on Missile Defense, CU Issue 82, November 11, 2010
  The OSCE and Kyrgyzstan’s Election, CU Issue 81, October 30, 2010
  Unblocking the US-Azerbaijan Relationship, CU Issue 80, October 07, 2010
  Nabucco Pipeline: Quo Vadis?, CU Issue 79, September 30, 2010
  Russia tightens its grip in the South Caucasus, CU Issue 78, August 23, 2010
  Armenian Politics: Rigidity Versus Flexibility, CU Issue 77, August 10, 2010
  Russia and Georgia: Ready To Talk?, CU Issue 76, July 21, 2010
  Can the US walk and chew gum at the same time?, CU Issue 75, July 9, 2010
  The Kyrgyzstan Crisis – A Qualified Success for Turkish Diplomacy?, CU Issue 74, June 24, 2010
  Brussels downgrades the Caucasus, CU Issue 73, June 07, 2010
  NATO’s New Strategic Concept and the Caspian Region, CU Issue 72, June 01, 2010
  Joe Biden and European Security, CU Issue 71, May 13, 2010
  Behind the US-Azerbaijan row, CU Issue 70, May 6, 2010
  Turkey and Iran: The risks of failure, CU Issue 69, April 30, 2010
  Kazakhstan, the OSCE, and the crisis in Kyrgyzstan, CU Issue 68, April 19, 2010
  The Implications of the Moscow Bombings, CU Issue 67, April 12, 2010
  Iran Manoeuvres for a role in Karabakh, CU Issue 66, April 5, 2010
  The EU and Abkhazia: Between a rock and a hard place, CU Issue 65, March 16, 2010
  Fallout from the US ‘Genocide’ vote, CU Issue 64, March 9, 2010
  Ukraine's elections and future of GUAM, CU Issue 63, February 10, 2010
  Less Democracy, More Security: Kazakhstan and the OSCE, CU Issue 62, January 18, 2010
  Tackling the North Caucasus Insurgency: Development or Rhetoric?, CU Issue 61, January 11, 2010
  The Caspian Region in 2010, CU Issue 60, January 4, 2010
  The Caspian Region in 2010, CU Issue 59, December 31, 2009
  The Turkmenistan-China Pipeline Changes the Energy Balance, CU Issue 58, December 21, 2009
  Russia’s European Security Treaty, CU Issue 57, December 7, 2009
  The ‘Kidnapping War’ in Georgia and its Implications, CU Issue 56, December 3, 2009
  Azerbaijan Shifts its Energy Priorities, CU Issue 55, November 23, 2009
  The South Caucasian States and Afghanistan, CU Issue 54, November 11, 2009
  Is Turkey turning East?, CU Issue 53, November 2, 2009
  What is Russia’s Gameplan for Iran?, CU Issue 52, October 26, 2009
  Turkey, Armenia and Azerbaijan: Where Next?, CU Issue 51, October 19, 2009
  The Armenians of Georgia: A New Flashpoint in the Caucasus?, CU Issue 50, October 12, 2009
  Turkey’s EU Membership: Will The ‘Armenian Opening’ Help?, CU Issue 49, October 5, 2009
  The Missile Defence Shift: Implications for the Caucasus, CU Issue 48, September 22, 2009
  Rising Tensions in the Black Sea , CU Issue 47, September 14, 2009
  Armenia, Turkey, and Azerbaijan: The Clock Is Ticking, CU Issue 46, September 7, 2009
  The Battle of the Bases in Central Asia, CU Issue 45, August 31, 2009
  Russia, Israel, and the S-300s, CU Issue 44, August 24, 2009
  The motivations behind Turkey's 'Kurdish Initiative', CU Issue 43, August 17, 2009
  The Implications of the Turkmenistan-Azerbaijan Dispute, CU Issue 42, August 10, 2009
  What has changed since the August war?, CU Issue 41, August 3, 2009
  The Internal Dynamics of Armenia’s Karabakh Policy, CU Issue 40, July 20, 2009
  Gazprom’s Baku Triumph, CU Issue 39, July 06, 2009
  Ingushetia: The New Chechnya?, CU Issue 38, June 29, 2009
  Georgias Economy - A Matter for Diplomats, CU Issue 37, June 22, 2009
  ‘Progress’ In The Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Process, CU Issue 36, June 08, 2009
  Iran's Azerbaijanis and the presidential election, CU Issue 35, June 01, 2009
  Nabucco and South Stream - The Race Heats Up, CU Issue 34, May 25, 2009
  China and Central Asia, CU Issue 33, May 19, 2009
  Russia, Georgia, and NATO - A Bad Week, CU Issue 32, May 11, 2009
  The Obama Administration’s Emerging Caucasus Policy, CU Issue 31, April 27, 2009
  Integration and Division in the Caspian Sea, CU Issue 30, April 20, 2009
  The Turkish-Armenian Rapprochement - Implications for the South Caucasus, CU Issue 29, April 13, 2009
  Turkey's local elections and Armenian issue, CU Issue 28, April 6, 2009
  Is There Life Left In The Nabucco Project?, CU Issue 27, March 30, 2009
  Problems and Prospects for Russian Military Reform, CU Issue 26, March 23, 2009
  Russia and Georgia: Not back to war, CU Issue 25, March 16, 2009
  Armenia: Heading towards crisis?, CU Issue 24, March 9, 2009
  Drug trafficking in the Caucasus, CU Issue 23, February 23, 2009
  Russian-led military block: A real counterweight to NATO?, CU Issue 22, February 16, 2009
  Are the International Missions in Georgia still relevant?, CU Issue 21, February 9, 2009
  Israel and Azerbaijan: Baku’s Balancing Act, CU Issue 20, February 2, 2009
  The North Caucasus in 2009: A Bleak Forecast, CU Issue 19, January 26, 2009
  The Military Balance in Nagorno-Karabakh, CU Issue 18, January 19, 2009
  Russia, Iran, and Barack Obama in 2009, Part II, CU Issue 17, January 12, 2009
  Looking forward to 2009 in the Caucasus and beyond, Part I, CU Issue 16, January 5, 2009
  The opportunities and the risks of NATO’s new supply routes, CU Issue 15, December 22, 2008
  The Black Sea Ambitions of Armenia, CU Issue 14, December 15, 2008
  Another Small Step for Nabucco, CU Issue 13, December 8, 2008
  Will Saakashvili survive politically?, CU Issue 12, December 1, 2008
  The latest fashion: conflict mediation, CU Issue 11, November 24, 2008
  The Baku Energy Summit, CU Issue 10, November 17, 2008
  Obama and the Caucasus, CU Issue 9, November 10, 2008
  Kazakhstan's oil options, CU Issue 8, November 3, 2008
  Is the Minsk Group being sidelined?, CU Issue 7, October 27, 2008
  Gas and oil developments in the Caspian region, CU Issue 6, October 20, 2008
  Where next for the Georgian peace process?, CU Issue 5, October 8, 2008
  Unrest in the North Caucasus, CU Issue 4, September 29, 2008
  Saakashvili's future, CU Issue 3, September 22, 2008
  Iran after the Georgian War, CU Issue 2, September 15, 2008
  Football diplomacy, CU Issue 1, September 8, 2008
       
 
  © 2006-2010 CRIA
  All rights reserved

Editorial Board
Advisory Board
Our Authors

Back Issues
Caucasus Update
Current Issue

Contact Us
Subscribe
Join us on Facebook