About us   Editorial Board   Advisory Board   Subscribe   Contact us  
 


CAUCASUS UPDATE

In this section, we publish the weekly analysis of the major events taking place in the Caucasus and beyond. The Caucasus Update is written by our Senior Editor Alexander Jackson. Click here to subscribe.

Azerbaijan Shifts its Energy Priorities, CU Issue 55, November 23, 2009

For all the talk of Turkey moving away from Europe, the real story of a Western ally slowly turning East has been ignored. In recent weeks Azerbaijan has undertaken a series of moves which could, in the long term, lead to the loss of EU access to Caspian gas and a major reorientation in the region’s geopolitics.

If this occurs then Europe and Turkey will only have themselves to blame. Europe has repeatedly failed to make progress on the Nabucco project, which would carry Caspian and Middle Eastern gas to the heart of Europe and partially liberate it from reliance on Russian gas. This hugely expensive and ambitious project required firm political and financial commitments which Brussels has not delivered. Instead, individual European governments have been successfully courted by Russia’s Gazprom for its rival South Stream pipeline under the Black Sea. Turkey’s obstructionism and failure to acknowledge the links between energy and conflict-resolution in the region make it also responsible.

The Nabucco problem has been one of demand – insufficient commitment by the EU – but also one of supply. The only confirmed source of gas is Azerbaijan. Other possible suppliers – Iran, Central Asia, Iraq, and Egypt – have their own specific problems.

Now it looks as if even Azerbaijan is starting to slip away. In June, Azerbaijan’s state energy company SOCAR signed a deal with Russia’s Gazprom. The quantities involved (500 million cubic metres (mcm)) were insignificant, but this was a warning shot to Brussels and Ankara to hurry up with Nabucco. In November Baku has upped the stakes by making some serious overtures elsewhere.

Firstly, SOCAR signed a deal with Iran, promising over 500mcm a year from 2010 (Press TV, November 12). Like the Gazprom deal, this is another placeholder, since the amounts involved are negligible. The significance is political: the agreement holds open the possibility of increasing the contracted amount in years to come. Iran is also a pariah in the West, and expanding energy ties with it is a clear message from Baku. Secondly, Azerbaijan agreed to ship 7 to 8 billion cubic meters (bcm) of its gas annually via tankers in a compressed form to Bulgaria, bypassing Turkey (Eurasia Daily Monitor, November 16).

Shortly afterwards, Baku made its bluntest threat yet. “If Europe takes too long putting together a solution, then all the gas in the Caspian will go to Asia,” said a SOCAR official. “It’s more serious than it seems” (Bloomberg, November 19). China – which has been hungrily expanding its energy presence in Central Asia recently - is the obvious target market. Currently, the infrastructure to send Azerbaijani gas to China does not exist. But SOCAR’s threat seems to be genuine.

Ironically, the main obstacle to Azerbaijani gas heading east is also the main obstacle to Nabucco. A Trans-Caspian Pipeline (TCP) between Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan, long in the planning, is still far from being built. Russian and Iranian objections are partly responsible; so is a recent dispute between Ashgabat and Baku over the ownership of disputed gas fields. Turkmenistan has even threatened to take Azerbaijan before a court of international arbitration.

Alarmed at the prospect of losing Turkmen gas for the foreseeable future, the US has taken the unusual step of offering to mediate in the dispute (APA, November 18). If the dispute is resolved and a TCP is built, it may ultimately be used to send Azerbaijani gas east, not Turkmen gas west.

Why the sudden activity by Baku? Partly, the moves are designed to call Europe’s bluff and provoke it into action on Nabucco. Unfortunately, Brussels doesn’t seem to have heard the message. The timing of the moves, however, indicates at a deeper and more alarming reason: growing disenchantment with Azerbaijan’s longstanding ally, Turkey.

For years Ankara has obstructed Nabucco by insisting on preferential price tariffs and a share of the allocated gas for its own domestic market. Negotiations have continued for some time, and Baku was willing to politely discuss the issue – up to a point. This changed when Turkey’s government decided to press on with normalising relations with Armenia, before any progress has been made on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Turkey’s decision has been widely viewed in Azerbaijan as a betrayal of the fraternal relationship between the two countries, and prompted Baku to take an increasingly tough stance on gas negotiations. Ankara needs Nabucco to fulfill its goal of being a regional energy hub, and appears unwilling to back down. Whilst previously the disagreement was largely commercial, Baku’s fury over the ‘Armenian thaw’ has made the pricing dispute extremely political.

There is a very real risk that the sense of inertia created by these obstacles will finally kill off Nabucco’s prospects. Although a deal with Turkey will almost certainly be struck in the end, the long-term damage will have been done.

The implication could well be Azerbaijan’s gradual shift away from the West’s geopolitical orbit. The role of oil and gas pipelines in tying states together is sometimes overstated but, in the long run, Baku could find itself closely linked with Moscow and Tehran through commercial relationships. Oil and gas underpin Azerbaijan’s economy: its energy ties inevitably influence its foreign policy.

As always in the Caspian region, business is politics. The tension over Nabucco has been building for some time, but the immediate trigger of Azerbaijan’s energy shift was the Turkish decision to negotiate with Armenia without progress on Karabakh. Unless Ankara alters its position, there is no reason to doubt that Azerbaijan’s long-term gas strategy will change.

Policymakers in Brussels and in Washington should acknowledge the dangers involved and commit themselves to resolving this situation through serious, frank dialogue with Ankara and Baku. Failure to act now will have severe consequences for energy security, and geopolitics, in the long term.



"Azerbaijan Shifts its Energy Priorities, CU Issue 55, November 23, 2009" | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
PREVIOUS ISSUES

  Caspian Compromise Backfires for Russia and Iran, CU Issue 83, November 24, 2010
  Turkey in a Tight Spot on Missile Defense, CU Issue 82, November 11, 2010
  The OSCE and Kyrgyzstan’s Election, CU Issue 81, October 30, 2010
  Unblocking the US-Azerbaijan Relationship, CU Issue 80, October 07, 2010
  Nabucco Pipeline: Quo Vadis?, CU Issue 79, September 30, 2010
  Russia tightens its grip in the South Caucasus, CU Issue 78, August 23, 2010
  Armenian Politics: Rigidity Versus Flexibility, CU Issue 77, August 10, 2010
  Russia and Georgia: Ready To Talk?, CU Issue 76, July 21, 2010
  Can the US walk and chew gum at the same time?, CU Issue 75, July 9, 2010
  The Kyrgyzstan Crisis – A Qualified Success for Turkish Diplomacy?, CU Issue 74, June 24, 2010
  Brussels downgrades the Caucasus, CU Issue 73, June 07, 2010
  NATO’s New Strategic Concept and the Caspian Region, CU Issue 72, June 01, 2010
  Joe Biden and European Security, CU Issue 71, May 13, 2010
  Behind the US-Azerbaijan row, CU Issue 70, May 6, 2010
  Turkey and Iran: The risks of failure, CU Issue 69, April 30, 2010
  Kazakhstan, the OSCE, and the crisis in Kyrgyzstan, CU Issue 68, April 19, 2010
  The Implications of the Moscow Bombings, CU Issue 67, April 12, 2010
  Iran Manoeuvres for a role in Karabakh, CU Issue 66, April 5, 2010
  The EU and Abkhazia: Between a rock and a hard place, CU Issue 65, March 16, 2010
  Fallout from the US ‘Genocide’ vote, CU Issue 64, March 9, 2010
  Ukraine's elections and future of GUAM, CU Issue 63, February 10, 2010
  Less Democracy, More Security: Kazakhstan and the OSCE, CU Issue 62, January 18, 2010
  Tackling the North Caucasus Insurgency: Development or Rhetoric?, CU Issue 61, January 11, 2010
  The Caspian Region in 2010, CU Issue 60, January 4, 2010
  The Caspian Region in 2010, CU Issue 59, December 31, 2009
  The Turkmenistan-China Pipeline Changes the Energy Balance, CU Issue 58, December 21, 2009
  Russia’s European Security Treaty, CU Issue 57, December 7, 2009
  The ‘Kidnapping War’ in Georgia and its Implications, CU Issue 56, December 3, 2009
  Azerbaijan Shifts its Energy Priorities, CU Issue 55, November 23, 2009
  The South Caucasian States and Afghanistan, CU Issue 54, November 11, 2009
  Is Turkey turning East?, CU Issue 53, November 2, 2009
  What is Russia’s Gameplan for Iran?, CU Issue 52, October 26, 2009
  Turkey, Armenia and Azerbaijan: Where Next?, CU Issue 51, October 19, 2009
  The Armenians of Georgia: A New Flashpoint in the Caucasus?, CU Issue 50, October 12, 2009
  Turkey’s EU Membership: Will The ‘Armenian Opening’ Help?, CU Issue 49, October 5, 2009
  The Missile Defence Shift: Implications for the Caucasus, CU Issue 48, September 22, 2009
  Rising Tensions in the Black Sea , CU Issue 47, September 14, 2009
  Armenia, Turkey, and Azerbaijan: The Clock Is Ticking, CU Issue 46, September 7, 2009
  The Battle of the Bases in Central Asia, CU Issue 45, August 31, 2009
  Russia, Israel, and the S-300s, CU Issue 44, August 24, 2009
  The motivations behind Turkey's 'Kurdish Initiative', CU Issue 43, August 17, 2009
  The Implications of the Turkmenistan-Azerbaijan Dispute, CU Issue 42, August 10, 2009
  What has changed since the August war?, CU Issue 41, August 3, 2009
  The Internal Dynamics of Armenia’s Karabakh Policy, CU Issue 40, July 20, 2009
  Gazprom’s Baku Triumph, CU Issue 39, July 06, 2009
  Ingushetia: The New Chechnya?, CU Issue 38, June 29, 2009
  Georgias Economy - A Matter for Diplomats, CU Issue 37, June 22, 2009
  ‘Progress’ In The Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Process, CU Issue 36, June 08, 2009
  Iran's Azerbaijanis and the presidential election, CU Issue 35, June 01, 2009
  Nabucco and South Stream - The Race Heats Up, CU Issue 34, May 25, 2009
  China and Central Asia, CU Issue 33, May 19, 2009
  Russia, Georgia, and NATO - A Bad Week, CU Issue 32, May 11, 2009
  The Obama Administration’s Emerging Caucasus Policy, CU Issue 31, April 27, 2009
  Integration and Division in the Caspian Sea, CU Issue 30, April 20, 2009
  The Turkish-Armenian Rapprochement - Implications for the South Caucasus, CU Issue 29, April 13, 2009
  Turkey's local elections and Armenian issue, CU Issue 28, April 6, 2009
  Is There Life Left In The Nabucco Project?, CU Issue 27, March 30, 2009
  Problems and Prospects for Russian Military Reform, CU Issue 26, March 23, 2009
  Russia and Georgia: Not back to war, CU Issue 25, March 16, 2009
  Armenia: Heading towards crisis?, CU Issue 24, March 9, 2009
  Drug trafficking in the Caucasus, CU Issue 23, February 23, 2009
  Russian-led military block: A real counterweight to NATO?, CU Issue 22, February 16, 2009
  Are the International Missions in Georgia still relevant?, CU Issue 21, February 9, 2009
  Israel and Azerbaijan: Baku’s Balancing Act, CU Issue 20, February 2, 2009
  The North Caucasus in 2009: A Bleak Forecast, CU Issue 19, January 26, 2009
  The Military Balance in Nagorno-Karabakh, CU Issue 18, January 19, 2009
  Russia, Iran, and Barack Obama in 2009, Part II, CU Issue 17, January 12, 2009
  Looking forward to 2009 in the Caucasus and beyond, Part I, CU Issue 16, January 5, 2009
  The opportunities and the risks of NATO’s new supply routes, CU Issue 15, December 22, 2008
  The Black Sea Ambitions of Armenia, CU Issue 14, December 15, 2008
  Another Small Step for Nabucco, CU Issue 13, December 8, 2008
  Will Saakashvili survive politically?, CU Issue 12, December 1, 2008
  The latest fashion: conflict mediation, CU Issue 11, November 24, 2008
  The Baku Energy Summit, CU Issue 10, November 17, 2008
  Obama and the Caucasus, CU Issue 9, November 10, 2008
  Kazakhstan's oil options, CU Issue 8, November 3, 2008
  Is the Minsk Group being sidelined?, CU Issue 7, October 27, 2008
  Gas and oil developments in the Caspian region, CU Issue 6, October 20, 2008
  Where next for the Georgian peace process?, CU Issue 5, October 8, 2008
  Unrest in the North Caucasus, CU Issue 4, September 29, 2008
  Saakashvili's future, CU Issue 3, September 22, 2008
  Iran after the Georgian War, CU Issue 2, September 15, 2008
  Football diplomacy, CU Issue 1, September 8, 2008
       
 
  © 2006-2010 CRIA
  All rights reserved

Editorial Board
Advisory Board
Our Authors

Back Issues
Caucasus Update
Current Issue

Contact Us
Subscribe
Join us on Facebook