About us   Editorial Board   Advisory Board   Subscribe   Contact us  
 


CAUCASUS UPDATE

In this section, we publish the weekly analysis of the major events taking place in the Caucasus and beyond. The Caucasus Update is written by our Senior Editor Alexander Jackson. Click here to subscribe.

Less Democracy, More Security: Kazakhstan and the OSCE, CU Issue 62, January 18, 2010

Kazakhstan’s chairing of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), the first former Soviet republic or Central Asian state to do so, is a huge achievement for Astana. It is less of a success for the OSCE itself. The organisation’s commitment to monitoring elections, strengthening human rights, and supporting democratisation sits uncomfortably with Kazakhstan’s track record on these issues.

Fully aware of this, Astana has chosen instead to emphasise the OSCE’s first and second ‘dimensions’ – politico-military security, and economic and environmental security. The priorities outlined by Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev, and his Foreign Minister (now OSCE Chairman-in-Office) Kanat Saudabayev, are instructive (OSCE, 14 January). There are three that should be closely considered.

Firstly is Mr Saudabayev’s explicit reference to Russia’s draft European Security Treaty. The EST, distributed to cautious European and American diplomats in December, would alter Eurasia’s security architecture to give greater weight to Russia and thereby marginalise NATO and the OSCE itself (Caucasus Update, December 7 2009). The EST was quietly dropped by Western policymakers: for Astana to bring it up again is not only diplomatically awkward, but raises some interesting questions about how Kazakhstan views its relationship with the wider Eurasian community.

In his address to the OSCE, President Nazarbayev declared that the biggest challenge facing the organisation was “whether it can convert itself into a structure that recognizes the diversity of the world. . . or whether it will continue to be an organization segmented into blocs, where the West remains aloof from the space “east of Vienna”?” In other words, will Europe and North America continue to criticise the former Soviet space for paying insufficient attention to democracy, human rights, and so on.

In light of this surprisingly blunt criticism of Western moralising, it seems that Astana could view Russia’s EST as an alternative to the OSCE, not (as Moscow intended) to NATO. Russia grudgingly tolerates the OSCE for providing it with a seat at the table on European security, but loathes NATO; Kazakhstan is generally positive towards the Alliance, which provides it with training and equipment, but dislikes the OSCE’s democratisation agenda.

Nonetheless, President Nazabayev recognises the organisation’s importance. Perhaps in a veiled rebuff to Russia (in which case, he was simply being polite with regards to the EST), he insisted that “the OSCE is an organization that cannot be replaced. Its stagnation or disappearance would create a volatile vacuum in the Euro-Atlantic area”.

The second and most promising priority area is Afghanistan. Kazakhstan’s geographic location means that, unlike European chairs of the OSCE, the situation in Afghanistan could pose a genuine threat to its security, if violence flares in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan. Astana’s cordial relations with most of the other Central Asian states also puts it in a better position to support border-strengthening measures along the Afghan frontier, and to encourage collaboration against Islamist extremism in the region.

The third significant priority is the focus on the South Caucasus. Mr Saudabayev announced that his first visit as Chairman-in-Office would be to the region, and solicited help from the OSCE delegates in resolving the conflicts there.

Certainly, Kazakhstan has a unique role to play in mediating in the region’s conflicts. As a former Soviet republic, and a state in the heart of Eurasia, Kazakhstan can offer its services as an impartial negotiator who knows first-hand the tensions between Russia and its former satellites (in the case of Georgia), as well as the complex ethno-political legacy which the USSR left behind (in the case of Armenia and Azerbaijan). Given Kazakhstan’s desire to establish itself as an energy source for the West, the Turkey-Georgia-Azerbaijan energy and transport corridor also helps to bind it to the region.

But international politics is a tough business, especially in Eurasia. A shared history and a mutual interest in energy routes will not easily translate into conflict resolution. Kazakhstan has, for instance, expressed its willingness to help settle the conflict between Georgia and Russia over Abkhazia and South Ossetia. It is unlikely to do so. From Russia’s point of view the OSCE is still the OSCE, whether it is headed by Kazakhstan or (as in 2009) by Greece. Astana’s chairmanship does not change the realities on the ground or the hard-headed national interests of regional players. It is also unlikely to fire up renewed efforts by the Minsk Group, the OSCE’s own trilateral group of mediators tasked with resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

In other words, we should not expect too much from Kazakhstan. The OSCE Chairman-in-Office is just that: a chairman. The organisation’s consensus-focused model means that no single state has the ability or the time to force through any sweeping policies or declarations. Compromise and dialogue are the order of the day.

This may be useful, nonetheless. Kazakhstan’s eagerness to avoid talking about democracy and human rights might force it to focus heavily on politico-military security, and to help create a space for contentious issues, such as the EST or Nagorno-Karabakh, to be discussed. More security and less democracy may not be the most welcome approach. But security is in short supply in parts of Eurasia: the chance to build it should not be missed.



"Less Democracy, More Security: Kazakhstan and the OSCE, CU Issue 62, January 18, 2010" | 0 comments
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
PREVIOUS ISSUES

  Caspian Compromise Backfires for Russia and Iran, CU Issue 83, November 24, 2010
  Turkey in a Tight Spot on Missile Defense, CU Issue 82, November 11, 2010
  The OSCE and Kyrgyzstan’s Election, CU Issue 81, October 30, 2010
  Unblocking the US-Azerbaijan Relationship, CU Issue 80, October 07, 2010
  Nabucco Pipeline: Quo Vadis?, CU Issue 79, September 30, 2010
  Russia tightens its grip in the South Caucasus, CU Issue 78, August 23, 2010
  Armenian Politics: Rigidity Versus Flexibility, CU Issue 77, August 10, 2010
  Russia and Georgia: Ready To Talk?, CU Issue 76, July 21, 2010
  Can the US walk and chew gum at the same time?, CU Issue 75, July 9, 2010
  The Kyrgyzstan Crisis – A Qualified Success for Turkish Diplomacy?, CU Issue 74, June 24, 2010
  Brussels downgrades the Caucasus, CU Issue 73, June 07, 2010
  NATO’s New Strategic Concept and the Caspian Region, CU Issue 72, June 01, 2010
  Joe Biden and European Security, CU Issue 71, May 13, 2010
  Behind the US-Azerbaijan row, CU Issue 70, May 6, 2010
  Turkey and Iran: The risks of failure, CU Issue 69, April 30, 2010
  Kazakhstan, the OSCE, and the crisis in Kyrgyzstan, CU Issue 68, April 19, 2010
  The Implications of the Moscow Bombings, CU Issue 67, April 12, 2010
  Iran Manoeuvres for a role in Karabakh, CU Issue 66, April 5, 2010
  The EU and Abkhazia: Between a rock and a hard place, CU Issue 65, March 16, 2010
  Fallout from the US ‘Genocide’ vote, CU Issue 64, March 9, 2010
  Ukraine's elections and future of GUAM, CU Issue 63, February 10, 2010
  Less Democracy, More Security: Kazakhstan and the OSCE, CU Issue 62, January 18, 2010
  Tackling the North Caucasus Insurgency: Development or Rhetoric?, CU Issue 61, January 11, 2010
  The Caspian Region in 2010, CU Issue 60, January 4, 2010
  The Caspian Region in 2010, CU Issue 59, December 31, 2009
  The Turkmenistan-China Pipeline Changes the Energy Balance, CU Issue 58, December 21, 2009
  Russia’s European Security Treaty, CU Issue 57, December 7, 2009
  The ‘Kidnapping War’ in Georgia and its Implications, CU Issue 56, December 3, 2009
  Azerbaijan Shifts its Energy Priorities, CU Issue 55, November 23, 2009
  The South Caucasian States and Afghanistan, CU Issue 54, November 11, 2009
  Is Turkey turning East?, CU Issue 53, November 2, 2009
  What is Russia’s Gameplan for Iran?, CU Issue 52, October 26, 2009
  Turkey, Armenia and Azerbaijan: Where Next?, CU Issue 51, October 19, 2009
  The Armenians of Georgia: A New Flashpoint in the Caucasus?, CU Issue 50, October 12, 2009
  Turkey’s EU Membership: Will The ‘Armenian Opening’ Help?, CU Issue 49, October 5, 2009
  The Missile Defence Shift: Implications for the Caucasus, CU Issue 48, September 22, 2009
  Rising Tensions in the Black Sea , CU Issue 47, September 14, 2009
  Armenia, Turkey, and Azerbaijan: The Clock Is Ticking, CU Issue 46, September 7, 2009
  The Battle of the Bases in Central Asia, CU Issue 45, August 31, 2009
  Russia, Israel, and the S-300s, CU Issue 44, August 24, 2009
  The motivations behind Turkey's 'Kurdish Initiative', CU Issue 43, August 17, 2009
  The Implications of the Turkmenistan-Azerbaijan Dispute, CU Issue 42, August 10, 2009
  What has changed since the August war?, CU Issue 41, August 3, 2009
  The Internal Dynamics of Armenia’s Karabakh Policy, CU Issue 40, July 20, 2009
  Gazprom’s Baku Triumph, CU Issue 39, July 06, 2009
  Ingushetia: The New Chechnya?, CU Issue 38, June 29, 2009
  Georgias Economy - A Matter for Diplomats, CU Issue 37, June 22, 2009
  ‘Progress’ In The Nagorno-Karabakh Peace Process, CU Issue 36, June 08, 2009
  Iran's Azerbaijanis and the presidential election, CU Issue 35, June 01, 2009
  Nabucco and South Stream - The Race Heats Up, CU Issue 34, May 25, 2009
  China and Central Asia, CU Issue 33, May 19, 2009
  Russia, Georgia, and NATO - A Bad Week, CU Issue 32, May 11, 2009
  The Obama Administration’s Emerging Caucasus Policy, CU Issue 31, April 27, 2009
  Integration and Division in the Caspian Sea, CU Issue 30, April 20, 2009
  The Turkish-Armenian Rapprochement - Implications for the South Caucasus, CU Issue 29, April 13, 2009
  Turkey's local elections and Armenian issue, CU Issue 28, April 6, 2009
  Is There Life Left In The Nabucco Project?, CU Issue 27, March 30, 2009
  Problems and Prospects for Russian Military Reform, CU Issue 26, March 23, 2009
  Russia and Georgia: Not back to war, CU Issue 25, March 16, 2009
  Armenia: Heading towards crisis?, CU Issue 24, March 9, 2009
  Drug trafficking in the Caucasus, CU Issue 23, February 23, 2009
  Russian-led military block: A real counterweight to NATO?, CU Issue 22, February 16, 2009
  Are the International Missions in Georgia still relevant?, CU Issue 21, February 9, 2009
  Israel and Azerbaijan: Baku’s Balancing Act, CU Issue 20, February 2, 2009
  The North Caucasus in 2009: A Bleak Forecast, CU Issue 19, January 26, 2009
  The Military Balance in Nagorno-Karabakh, CU Issue 18, January 19, 2009
  Russia, Iran, and Barack Obama in 2009, Part II, CU Issue 17, January 12, 2009
  Looking forward to 2009 in the Caucasus and beyond, Part I, CU Issue 16, January 5, 2009
  The opportunities and the risks of NATO’s new supply routes, CU Issue 15, December 22, 2008
  The Black Sea Ambitions of Armenia, CU Issue 14, December 15, 2008
  Another Small Step for Nabucco, CU Issue 13, December 8, 2008
  Will Saakashvili survive politically?, CU Issue 12, December 1, 2008
  The latest fashion: conflict mediation, CU Issue 11, November 24, 2008
  The Baku Energy Summit, CU Issue 10, November 17, 2008
  Obama and the Caucasus, CU Issue 9, November 10, 2008
  Kazakhstan's oil options, CU Issue 8, November 3, 2008
  Is the Minsk Group being sidelined?, CU Issue 7, October 27, 2008
  Gas and oil developments in the Caspian region, CU Issue 6, October 20, 2008
  Where next for the Georgian peace process?, CU Issue 5, October 8, 2008
  Unrest in the North Caucasus, CU Issue 4, September 29, 2008
  Saakashvili's future, CU Issue 3, September 22, 2008
  Iran after the Georgian War, CU Issue 2, September 15, 2008
  Football diplomacy, CU Issue 1, September 8, 2008
       
 
  © 2006-2010 CRIA
  All rights reserved

Editorial Board
Advisory Board
Our Authors

Back Issues
Caucasus Update
Current Issue

Contact Us
Subscribe
Join us on Facebook